This page describes how CasinoPayments.ca decides what to write about casino payments and how it keeps that writing honest over time. The rules are short. Following them takes most of the work behind each page.
Primary sources first
A fact is taken from the organisation that controls it. How Interac e-Transfer works comes from Interac. The launch date of Alberta’s regulated market comes from AiGC, Alberta’s provincial gaming corporation. A casino’s withdrawal limit comes from that casino’s payment terms. Comparison sites, forum threads and other casino guides can point to a question worth asking; they are not the answer to it.
The order of preference, in practice:
- the provider’s or regulator’s own page;
- the operator’s own terms and cashier information, for operator-specific facts;
- official consumer guidance, such as the Financial Consumer Agency of Canada, for how a payment type is generally treated.
Where a page links to an external source, the link goes to that primary page, not to a summary of it.
Behind the guide.
-
Each payment detail starts from a primary source: the operator's own payment terms, the payment provider's published guidance, or a regulator's page or register. A detail that no source publishes is marked as not published instead of being estimated.
-
Deposit and withdrawal support, limits, fees and stated windows are compared field by field. Each value keeps its scope: who stated it, for which method and direction, and whether it covers the casino's review or only the provider's transfer.
-
The guide then follows the payment in order, from the cashier to the destination account, notes the date each source was read, and names what a reader still needs to check in the terms that apply to them.
Every claim keeps its scope
A source supports a particular statement, about a particular product, in a particular place. The statement on the page may not be wider than that.
Two examples show how this works. Interac says transfer limits for e-Transfer are set by each financial institution (Interac), so no page here gives a single Interac limit for everyone. Flexepin describes a merchant cash-out feature for its vouchers (Flexepin), which rules out saying that every prepaid voucher is deposit-only, but it does not show that any Canadian casino offers that cash-out, so no page says one does.
The same applies to licences. A Kahnawà:ke permit is evidence of a permit, and the Commission itself notes that listed URLs are not accessible in every jurisdiction (Kahnawà:ke Gaming Commission). It is not evidence that a site is approved in a Canadian province, and the pages keep those two things apart.
Dates mean work was done
Each source used on the site is recorded with the date it was last checked. That date changes when someone has reopened the source and compared it with the statement, and only then. Changing a date without checking is not an update, and a page is not refreshed by moving its date forward.
Unknown stays unknown
When no primary source states a fee, a limit or a processing time, the page says it is not published. It does not estimate. A missing fee does not become “free”, a missing limit does not become “no limit”, and a missing payout time does not become “fast”. Tables on the site use an explicit unknown value for this, and the fee calculator keeps unknown layers visible instead of treating them as zero.
Operator-stated is not observed
Most numbers about a specific casino are the casino’s own: its stated minimum deposit, its stated processing period. The site labels them as stated by the operator. They are not presented as times that someone measured, and no page describes a deposit or a withdrawal as personally carried out unless it also describes how, when and under what conditions it happened.
How to read a claim on this site
0 of 5 checked
If the last answer is no, the page is out of date on that point. Rely on the source.
How comparisons are built
Comparisons on the site follow the same rules as single facts, with three additions. Deposit support and withdrawal support are separate columns, because a method that works in one direction often does not work in the other. Timing is split by stage, so the casino’s review, its release of the payment and the provider’s delivery are not merged into one figure. And every comparison states its criteria near the top, so a reader can see why one row sits above another.
Bonus amounts, where they appear, are never shown without the conditions that attach to them. A headline figure without its terms is a different claim from the offer itself, and only the full terms describe what a player actually receives. A payment method’s limits and an offer’s conditions are also kept apart: one does not answer questions about the other.
Commercial separation
The site earns commission through affiliate links to casino operators, as set out in the affiliate disclosure. That arrangement does not reach the explanations. How a payment method works, which direction it supports, what it costs and how long each stage takes are written from the sources above. A commercial relationship cannot add a method, a lower minimum, a faster payout or a licence that the sources do not support, and an operator’s commercial terms are never used as a source for a payment fact.
Images and tools
Photographic scenes are AI-generated illustrations, labelled as such, and are never used as evidence. Interactive tools state their assumptions: example rates are examples, example fees are examples, and a ticked checklist confirms only what the reader has ticked.
The update trail
What changed. What to check.
-
Payment method comparison and fourteen guides published
View the page -
Every source on the site checked and dated
View the page
Corrections
Corrections follow a fixed path whenever a source changes or a statement is found to be wrong. Readers can report an error by phone through the contact page.
- Find every affected page
Each page lists the sources it relies on, so a change in one source points to every page that cites it.
- Reopen and compare
The current source is read again against the exact wording on the page.
- Correct, narrow or remove
A statement that no longer holds is corrected. One that holds only partly is narrowed to what the source still supports. One without support is removed.
- Record the new check date
The source's checked date moves forward once the comparison has been made.
A correction replaces the wrong statement on the page.
Common questions
What counts as a primary source on this site?
The organisation that controls the fact: the payment provider for how its product works, the regulator for a licence or an age rule, the operator's own terms for its limits, fees and stated payout times. Comparison sites and forums are not used as the basis for a factual claim.
Has the site tested every casino it mentions?
No, and no page claims otherwise. Payout times and limits are given as the operator's stated figures, labelled that way, unless a page explicitly describes an observation and how it was made.
Do affiliate links influence what the guides say?
The explanations of how a payment method works, what it costs and how long it takes are written from the sources, not from commercial terms. A commercial relationship cannot add a method, a limit or a licence that the sources do not support. See the affiliate disclosure.
What happens when a source changes?
The statement that relied on it is checked again. If it no longer holds, it is corrected, narrowed or removed, and the checked date moves only when that work has actually been done.
Why do some tables show unknown instead of a number?
Because no primary source published one. An unpublished fee is not a zero fee, and an unpublished limit is not unlimited. Leaving the field unknown is more accurate than filling it with an estimate.
Sources
- Interac Corp.Checked October 19, 2026
- FlexepinChecked October 19, 2026
- Kahnawà:ke Gaming CommissionChecked October 19, 2026
- AiGCChecked October 19, 2026
- Financial Consumer Agency of CanadaChecked October 19, 2026